![]() But for me, it is less desirable than an NR tool that offers me more localized control. PureRaw does a fine job, but does its "take it or leave it" approach to these issues really reduce its overall value? THAT is something each of us ultimately must decide for ourselves. Once that is done you should send the image to Topaz Denoise AI to get started on noise reduction. Sharpening can be applied in DeNoise as well, or should be applied after the noise reduction process. I have recently learned that Lr's noise reduction has this ability as well. If you’re processing with DeNoise AI it is better to let it handle 100 of the noise reduction. That doesn't mean I'm going to get rid of my Topaz tools though, they are paid for, and they might have some value for SOME photos.īoth On1 and the Topaz tools have the ability to selectively mask areas of the photos for NR and sharpness, and then subsequently modify overall sharpness and NR if it isn't perfect. I recently bought On and I am quite satisfied with it's ability to control noise and sharpness in high ISO ORF files. But I do think they ultimately lead to false assessments of overall value. These things are fun to view and fun to make. The biggest problem with these types of articles is that they bog us down in minute differences when the truth is, all "AI" software of this sort is good enough for most people and most uses. That hasn't happened before the update ever and i eas just zooming in and out to compare the results. By the way LRC crashed my MacBook twice I mean completely nothing not even the mouse worked and then restarted by itself. So this was not a a picture with bad noise and i know that Topaz DeNoise AI does a really good jobeven with a lot of noise and i do use the Sharpen AI sometimes as well and works great. Speed wise i would say LRC DeNoise AI was a little faster, but not better in the end result. LRC doesn't give you much settings to change. So if i compare all three Topaz is still the winner because it not only removed noise but add sharpness to the picture and i can change settings if i don't like the results. Topaz DeNoise AI removed Noise and contained sharpness a touch better then LRC DeNoise AI. New LRC DeNoise AI removed Noise very welland fast, but still a little soft when zooming in. Denoise manual in LRC removed most of the noise, but made picture soft as well. noise wasn't to bad on the picture, but there was some. The picture i used foe now was shoot indoors with a Nikon D750 no flash ISO set to Auto -> 4500, tamron dx 18-400mm set to 35mm, f5.6 and speed to 1/320 sec (all manuel except iso). So I updated LRC just now to see how this new DeNoise Ai works. It'll remind you of the difference between a DSLR and a phone camera.I have been using Topaz DeNoise AI and Topaz Sharpen AI about a year now and really like the results. If you've used other noise reduction before, you'll be stunned by the image quality you get with DeNoise. It focuses on doing just one thing well: removing noise while keeping detail. Most noise reduction tools try to do dozens of different things. Technology with a single goal: less noise and more detail it allows you to get shots you otherwise would miss. Like a $1,600 lens, DeNoise doesn't just make your photos look better. It's almost like having a photographic superpower. You'd normally get ugly image noise by using a fast shutter speed in low light, but Topaz DeNoise can make you feel like there was never any noise at all. When available light is an issue, using a better lens often lets us take photos that we otherwise wouldn't be able to get. another? One big reason is that the higher-quality lens lets in more light. ![]() Topaz DeNoise gives you great noise reduction without having to upgrade your lens.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |